During Twitter’s #blogchat today, Mack Collier dropped the following idea in:
There’s a good post for someone, a post on what IS a good comment & where the ‘spam’ line is & how to cross it in comments #blogchat
Given I’m the sort that keeps this sort of idea floating around in my head for just such an occasion, I offered to take up the task. I comment on blogs all over the Web, and I try to follow these simple rules.
Of course, this is just one person’s view. And, I’m quite deliberately keeping it to a short list. Everyone’s going to have a different view, and the list could as easily be 100 rules as four.
Rule #1 — Add something to the conversation — as much as we can be inclined to say words to the effect of “I agree” or “I disagree”, what does that add to the conversation? Answer is, pretty much nothing. Try to add your own view, or thoughts or an additional facet to the topic.
Rule #2 — Be identifiable — it’s occasionally okay to be an Anonymous Coward, but 9 times out of 10 it’s much better to be identifiable. Why? Because the value accorded to your comment and to you in the form of social capital, or whuffie, from the other participants is measurably higher if you aren’t sheltering behind anonymity. So, make sure you put in a real email address and a URL that can be used to follow the White Rabbit that is you in that comment form. It’s karma, baby!
Rule #3 — Don’t link shill — we’re often tempted to put links to our own material around a subject. Hell, I do it all the time. But before you do, think for a moment. Ask yourself, “is this link really relevant to this conversation?” If the answer is no, or you’re not sure, don’t do it. Stick with the link you provided for Rule #2.
Rule #4 — Avoid relevance fallacy and playing the man — the downfall of many an unskilled high school debater (and everyone who never progressed beyond that point), relevance fallacy will bring you undone faster than… well, pretty damned fast. The other thing is playing the man — the favorite tactic of the troll. If you don’t agree with someone’s position, that’s cool, but use logic and well-reasoned argument to state your case rather than attacking the individual. Otherwise we’ll inevitably end up with invocation of Godwin’s Law. Argue nice and we’ll respect you for it in the morning, even if we still don’t agree.
If you sick to these rules, I think you’ll find your comments will improve, your writing will improve and your ability to debate well might even get a boost too.
Pingback: Twitted by marketingblogs
Rule #4 reads remarkably like a two for one Steve
.
Also, for blog authors, when they request a url from commenters, it’s worth providing info on whether the http:// is needed, such as what I’ve done on my site
Ben, I grouped those two together as they often go hand in hand. Consider it a bonus!
great post stephen, your point #2 (not hiding behind anonymity) I think is a very serious point. A lot of people will hide behind ‘anonymous’ when they have something very controversial to say. In my opinion that’s the best time to be being yourself, because your comment will hold more weight and be taken more seriously if people can follow up on you.
Pingback: Twitted by adobeInc
Couldn’t agree with you more re. point 2 Trib. Nothing sh*ts me more than when someone puts forth a strong (often contrarian) opinion but is too cowardly to attach their name to it. Weak.
Thanks, James. I (obviously) agree. I’m more than happy for contrary views to be published here, for example, provided the commenter gives me enough to identify them.
Well said. The other thing I might add is, if it is a heated, controversial subject and you really feel the need to comment, refrain from commenting from the next couple hour or so and think about what is being discussed and why you want to comment. (Also gives you time to wait for other people to comment and shed another perspective that might clear up the picture so you don’t need to comment, or otherwise.) This also gives you time to get control of your emotions so you can comment in a calm, composed manner.
The anonymity you mention in number two is important for all sorts of reasons, especially around building community. The bad behaviour that often comes about is often referred to as disinhibited…
now I must do a mental checklist here before clicking the post comment button to make sure this comment is suitable… no superfluous links, check, relevance? I think so, check… and so on
Related stories
Twitter friendship — an unpleasant itch
Like Euan Semple, I’m a little bothered by the notion of “friendship” as defined by Twitter. It bothers me more than a little that Twitter automatically declares those whose streams I choose to follow as “friends” simply because I’m interested in the work they do and the interesting material often posted outside their blogs and on their streams. I’d rather have the notions of relationships on Twitter split this way: at the top of the tree, an actual friend, with whom I have an actual relationship; next, colleagues with whom my relationship is professional, and; followers, who watch my stream out of interest. That way, I could theoretically post different material for each group, mixed material for some and unmediated material for general consumption. This would be more like Flickr’s notion of Friends, Family and Public access for photos.
OPINION — Best OS X Project Management software… OmniPlan
A while back now, I asked for advice on the 43folders forums on what folks considered to be the best project management software on OS X. Now, I’m more than happy to express the view that I think that PM software is largely a plan by the minions of Satan to drive people insane (why else would you use a Gantt chart?) and that project timelines, scheduling and resource allocation done this way is by and large futile, ‘cos running projects (particularly in the web development space) just doesn’t work this way. A couple of days ago, I received an email from someone who had read my question and wanted to know whether I’d found a suitable solution. The answer to that question is yes, and the choice is Omni Group’s OmniPlan, which has recently come out of beta. Now, while I still believe PM software is evil, for many of …
The firehose that is lifestreaming apps
I’m finding I have much the same response to these apps as Jevon expresses at his excellent blog, socialwrite. I see the usefulness. I want to share and consume. But the sheer firehose of data as soon as you exceed a certain number of friends is truly overwhelming and the signal is lost in the noise. Apps like FriendFeed are in their infancy and are showing significant early promise. They really do let you tap the vein of amazing data coming out of the applications your friends and colleagues choose to share. Unfortunately, at the moment, there’s no filter in there to slow the flow. At the moment, FriendFeed lets me unsub from someone, or “Hide entries like this”, so I do have the opportunity to filter out the low grade noise. But that’s not what I want. What I’d like to be able to do is somehow mark certain elements in the …
On the inside, the roses grow — value in corporate blogging
While the title is a reference to a line in a song that was the theme of one of the mainstays of 1980s Australian television, it’s also strongly reflective of my opinion on corporate blogging. Smart corporate blogging adoption is something that can have a marked effect in a number of areas in your organisation: perception of and actual corporate openness, particularly when the blogging is done across all levels of your organisation the degree to which a culture of knowledge sharing is adopted the feeling of connectedness and fraternity of staff at all levels with each other the ability of the organisation to recall context around decisions and events Corporate blogging can have a significant hand in the success of business when done right. Over last weekend, both Seth Godin and AT&T’s Todd Stephens had useful and important contributions to the corporate blogging conversation. Seth’s short post particularly highlights my point …