Today’s Public Sphere 2 at Parliament House in Canberra has the potential to reset the whole frame for Government 2.0 in Australia. 30-odd inspiring and well-informed speakers with real experience both within and in helping the public sector really showed the potential for a more open and collaborative model for government in this country.
In particular, the announcement from Finance Minister Lindsay Tanner and Special Minister of State Joe Ludwig, of the launch of the Government 2.0 Taskforce is of major importance — I’m surprised it’s not all across tech sector news (but then again, the fracas in the Parliament over other issues is kind of dominating political news). I’m more than impressed by the makeup of the Taskforce. If they’re listening, and I believe they are, here are my concerns and suggestions:
- please keep us up to date often on your deliberations and what you’re thinking about — release early, release often
- please don’t just listen to vendors and “industry” as they actually aren’t your best source of information — talk to those doing and those who want to do but are constrained by the culture of their organisations
- given your ability to provide grants for related work, please make them diverse and not just focussed on those with the time and resources to make detailed submissions — make the barrier very low
- there may be too many people on the Taskforce that feel like insiders and to few that are passionate doers — where are the people like OpenAustralia or CPD on the Taskforce? Where too are the passionate people — not agencies, but people involved in Open Source, participatory democracy, etc.? Please reach out to these people and get them deeply involved as soon as you can — many hands make light work
- this move means that the Clean Feed should be dead in the water — where was that announcement?
- many agencies still lack skills or cultural requirements to make the most of the work of the Taskforce — please ensure something happens to ensure both culture change and skill building takes place
I hope the Taskforce really does a great job.
I had just one concern on the day, that I raised with a couple of the other organisers — they agreed.
There were too few questions from those attendees who were not already a part of the open government community. That could quite legitimately have been because they felt overwhelmed with the volume of material presented today. But several presenters, including me, made explicit offers to talk to anyone who had questions. There were too few… I imagine the reason is a combination of culture present in the APS, amount of information and a little shyness amongst the attendees.
If you were an attendee, please do reach out and ask any questions you have to me or on the event wiki in a few days.







Jun 22, 2009 @ 22:23:36
Steve,
I agree that the day was a great success and hope that the snippets of understanding and taskforce initiative from the government into open discussion and policy development turn into real progress.
On questions from the gallery…I think that some part may be attributable to the volume of information presented, but from some discussions I had with other peers in the room it appeared that most where on the same page already and facing the same community *fear*, a point which you made
and hence had few questions, but were just happy that the tides may be finally turning at the Gov level.
I will definitely be taking a lot of the view points expressed today and arguments for open discussion back to the office and using the government as a great example of how this medium of involvement has to be embraced.
Looking forward to the next #publicsphere and will definitely be promoting these events to others in the future.
Cheers
Jun 23, 2009 @ 15:16:38
Steve,
Great post! I am planning on writing a post today which will include my thoughts on the lack of questions, I have had a very long think about that today. Will let you know when it’s done.
R
Jun 23, 2009 @ 20:15:48
It will be interesting to see what the taskforce understands by Gov 2.0. Although public consultations have been the basis of the 3 AGIMO online government trials whcih have preceeded this announcement the focus seems to have now shifted.
Jun 23, 2009 @ 20:19:34
Wholeheartedly agree, Sally. There is a new focus now that more of us are aware and passionate. The Taskforce risks irrelevance and giving of bad advice (as per my talk yesterday) if they don’t reach out and listen online to those of us doing work in Government 2.0.
And thanks for the support on the Taskforce blog. Appreciated.
Jun 24, 2009 @ 11:33:55
Regarding feedback: I was thinking that for some of us watching from afar, the time constraints may make it difficult to properly formulate questions (more so to do it in 125 characters or less). There was a massive amount of information presented today, and for those outside the room, no chance to bounce things off another peer to get an answer, or to test the waters, so to speak. As with speaking, it can be pretty intimidating to ask off-the-cuff in such a forum, particularly if one feels under-educated in a particular area, or that the answer may be “obvious” to those in the room. Without being there, that sense of being able to gauge room reaction is lost, so in some respects, that might be where outside participants are at a disadvantage.
My own impression for most of today was that things were *very* fast-paced, which meant that although I had questions, they were of a nature that I felt some of them would be better to follow up later (maybe even after some further reading), or were forgotten in the deluge of information. I’m pretty sure I wouldn’t be alone in this.
The pace of presentations to my mind meant that I wasn’t going to ask a question unless I was *very* sure it was relevant. There were also times I was reluctant to ask something knowing that many of the people present/watching would (or may) already know the answer. While asking the question might benefit me if I get an answer straight away, I’m fairly aware that it isn’t going to benefit the majority of the participants (and as well I might end up looking silly as a result, which I acknowledge is my own fear, so I have something in common with those reluctant to engage in that sense).
Of course if you’re not there at the event, it also makes it more difficult to focus 100% — in my case I had phone calls, a heap of stuff going on since we’re moving house and a very active two year old to distract me.
)
Jun 25, 2009 @ 11:22:11
Hi Sarah
Thanks for your honesty about how difficult you found it to ask questions on the day.
You should never feel like you will sound stupid asking a question. Don’t forget that most of the people who are comfortable with the 2.0 don’t understand the intricaies of your job. I’m sure anyone who spoke on the day would love to hear from you again to talk more.
Cheers
Sally
02 8303 2420
srose@openforum.com.au