<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
> <channel><title>Comments on: The inside the wall option with Twitter</title> <atom:link href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2008/10/27/the-inside-the-wall-option-with-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2008/10/27/the-inside-the-wall-option-with-twitter/</link> <description>Conversation. Collaboration. Community.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 02:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Stephen Collins</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2008/10/27/the-inside-the-wall-option-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-16528</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:50:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2008/10/27/the-inside-the-wall-option-with-twitter/#comment-16528</guid> <description>@Matthew, all valid points. Yes, multiple tools have potential for confusion, but it doesn&#039;t stop organisations that have successfully made the trasition to using these tools as a part of corporate DNA - IBM at the huge end and Janssen-Cilag at the small end are great examples.There&#039;s nobody I know at IBM, for example, that&#039;s confused about when to use internal tools and when to put something public. As your post suggests, a good acceptable use policy and a set of how to guidelines goes a long way and is a significant step in the right direction.I&#039;d love everyone to use Twitter, Facebook, whatever. But I still say there are certain business conversations that rightly don&#039;t take place in the public domain.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matthew, all valid points. Yes, multiple tools have potential for confusion, but it doesn&#8217;t stop organisations that have successfully made the trasition to using these tools as a part of corporate DNA &#8211; IBM at the huge end and Janssen-Cilag at the small end are great examples.</p><p>There&#8217;s nobody I know at IBM, for example, that&#8217;s confused about when to use internal tools and when to put something public. As your post suggests, a good acceptable use policy and a set of how to guidelines goes a long way and is a significant step in the right direction.</p><p>I&#8217;d love everyone to use Twitter, Facebook, whatever. But I still say there are certain business conversations that rightly don&#8217;t take place in the public domain.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Matthew Hodgson</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2008/10/27/the-inside-the-wall-option-with-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-16527</link> <dc:creator>Matthew Hodgson</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 01:41:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2008/10/27/the-inside-the-wall-option-with-twitter/#comment-16527</guid> <description>You&#039;ve seen through my dasterdly plan!Do you think that offering multiple tools, Twitter and Yammer for example, would lead to one being used by people more than the other and therefore dilute the ROI gained from these tools?I would have thought that there would be some confusion over which tool to use by some people. I would have also thought that, in the end, people will just have a preference for one over the other, and given the greater reach of Twitter I know which one I would use!M :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve seen through my dasterdly plan!</p><p>Do you think that offering multiple tools, Twitter and Yammer for example, would lead to one being used by people more than the other and therefore dilute the ROI gained from these tools?</p><p>I would have thought that there would be some confusion over which tool to use by some people. I would have also thought that, in the end, people will just have a preference for one over the other, and given the greater reach of Twitter I know which one I would use!</p><p>M <img
src='http://www.acidlabs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/13 queries in 0.996 seconds using disk

Served from: acmkokecse.gs01.gridserver.com @ 2010-03-15 21:20:36 -->