<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Knowledge worker - NOT a redundant term</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/28/knowledge-worker-not-a-redundant-term/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/28/knowledge-worker-not-a-redundant-term/</link>
	<description>strategies, tools and processes to empower knowledge workers</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 05:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: No Straight Lines</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/28/knowledge-worker-not-a-redundant-term/#comment-4146</link>
		<dc:creator>No Straight Lines</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 22:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/28/knowledge-worker-not-a-redundant-term/#comment-4146</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A conversation on the nature of knowledge work...&lt;/strong&gt;

A few weeks ago there was an interesting exchange of ideas among Shawn Callahan, Matt Hodgson, Stephen Collins, and Dave Snowden (and many others, I&#8217;m sure) on the nature of knowledge work. Some key excerpts:

......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A conversation on the nature of knowledge work&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>A few weeks ago there was an interesting exchange of ideas among Shawn Callahan, Matt Hodgson, Stephen Collins, and Dave Snowden (and many others, I&#8217;m sure) on the nature of knowledge work. Some key excerpts:&nbsp;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knowledge Worker: Redundant concept through ubiquosity or elitism? at HumaneIA</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/28/knowledge-worker-not-a-redundant-term/#comment-3474</link>
		<dc:creator>Knowledge Worker: Redundant concept through ubiquosity or elitism? at HumaneIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2007 05:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/28/knowledge-worker-not-a-redundant-term/#comment-3474</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Collins wrote the following: Shawn Callahan of Anecdote argues that the need for the term knowledge worker is redundant now that technology is ubiquitous in the developed world and that almost every worker trades in knowledge of some sort. He sees its use as a way to discriminate between identified knowledge workers and those whose roles are not traditionally viewed this way: It’s an dark undercurrent and tacitly becomes a basis for discrimination. “Our salespeople are knowledge workers but our gas fitters are not.” I suspect this feeling of superiority comes from the erroneous data-information-knowledge model where knowledge (and even more ridiculously, wisdom) sits at the pinnacle of the pyramid. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Steve Collins wrote the following: Shawn Callahan of Anecdote argues that the need for the term knowledge worker is redundant now that technology is ubiquitous in the developed world and that almost every worker trades in knowledge of some sort. He sees its use as a way to discriminate between identified knowledge workers and those whose roles are not traditionally viewed this way: It’s an dark undercurrent and tacitly becomes a basis for discrimination. “Our salespeople are knowledge workers but our gas fitters are not.” I suspect this feeling of superiority comes from the erroneous data-information-knowledge model where knowledge (and even more ridiculously, wisdom) sits at the pinnacle of the pyramid.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
