<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Enterprise apps *can* and *should* be sexy</title> <atom:link href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/</link> <description>Conversation. Collaboration. Community.</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 01:58:01 +0000</lastBuildDate> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <item><title>By: Doug Cornelius .com &#183; Sexy Software</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-20919</link> <dc:creator>Doug Cornelius .com &#183; Sexy Software</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 21:48:51 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-20919</guid> <description>[...] Stephen Collins of acidlabs thinks Enterprise apps *can* and *should* be sexy. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stephen Collins of acidlabs thinks Enterprise apps *can* and *should* be sexy. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dogear-Nation - Episode 43 - Sexy Enterprise Apps &#187; Dogear Nation</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-9331</link> <dc:creator>Dogear-Nation - Episode 43 - Sexy Enterprise Apps &#187; Dogear Nation</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2008 18:36:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-9331</guid> <description>[...] Tags: Enterprise apps should be sexy / Jasmin Tragas &#8212; http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tags: Enterprise apps should be sexy / Jasmin Tragas &#8212; <a
href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dogear Nation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dogear-Nation - Episode 43 - Sexy Enterprise Apps</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-8328</link> <dc:creator>Dogear Nation &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dogear-Nation - Episode 43 - Sexy Enterprise Apps</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 01:03:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-8328</guid> <description>[...] Tags: Enterprise apps should be sexy / Jasmin Tragas &#8212; http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/ [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Tags: Enterprise apps should be sexy / Jasmin Tragas &#8212; <a
href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/" rel="nofollow">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/</a> [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ulle</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3348</link> <dc:creator>Ulle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2007 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3348</guid> <description>Everything you said is right. And I guess that user-centered should be the most important criterion for the great collaboration software. Let&#039;s face it enterprise software is still used by the software guys mostly. We should make it simple - this is the basis. So that everybody could use it. And I would propose making it foolproof. So people wouldn&#039;t be afraid to make mistakes and learn. We can observe some significant steps in this direction from Wrike&#039;s side. It&#039;s one of the hottest project management products right now http://www.wrike.com/. The guys are doing a pretty good job, utilizing the ways that most people are used to. I mean tools like email.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everything you said is right. And I guess that user-centered should be the most important criterion for the great collaboration software. Let&#8217;s face it enterprise software is still used by the software guys mostly. We should make it simple &#8211; this is the basis. So that everybody could use it. And I would propose making it foolproof. So people wouldn&#8217;t be afraid to make mistakes and learn. We can observe some significant steps in this direction from Wrike&#8217;s side. It&#8217;s one of the hottest project management products right now <a
href="http://www.wrike.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.wrike.com/</a>. The guys are doing a pretty good job, utilizing the ways that most people are used to. I mean tools like email.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: frogpond &#187; Wiki usability and Enterprise software sexyness</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3337</link> <dc:creator>frogpond &#187; Wiki usability and Enterprise software sexyness</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 14:43:44 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3337</guid> <description>[...] of &#8220;industrial-strength-software proponents&#8221; are entertaining in a way because we know better (this is dire stuff, and I ask myself if those guys ever worked with enterprise-style-software like [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of &#8220;industrial-strength-software proponents&#8221; are entertaining in a way because we know better (this is dire stuff, and I ask myself if those guys ever worked with enterprise-style-software like [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Stephen Collins</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link> <dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 19:29:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3332</guid> <description>@Vinnie (crossposted from his blog)In making enterprise apps more user centered, what I&#039;m talking about is implementing a long, scientifically based, user centered process taking in elements of UI design, business process analysis, business precess reengineering and cultural change, all backed by strong HCI principles and human and organisational psychology.  Using this process is something I discovered working with my colleague Matthew Hodgson (http://magia3e.wordpress.com).  Before that, I was pretty succcessful doing the same thing, but much of my work was intuitive rather than scientific.
Taking a science-backed approach to user centered design on any application, let alone enterprise applications should lead to a better outcome for business and the users - internal and external.  Design work and user consultation takes place across the entire development lifecycle, surprises are reduced in user land, decisions about interfaces can be made early and changed early (and cheaply) if need be.
Enterprise apps don&#039;t need to be &quot;2.0&quot;, but given a significant proportion of users are now used to using applications that interact with them in that style (if there is a 2.0 style), we should be making the effort to adopt the best of what they are experiencing and put it into enterprise applications.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Vinnie (crossposted from his blog)</p><p>In making enterprise apps more user centered, what I&#8217;m talking about is implementing a long, scientifically based, user centered process taking in elements of UI design, business process analysis, business precess reengineering and cultural change, all backed by strong HCI principles and human and organisational psychology.  Using this process is something I discovered working with my colleague Matthew Hodgson (<a
href="http://magia3e.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://magia3e.wordpress.com</a>).  Before that, I was pretty succcessful doing the same thing, but much of my work was intuitive rather than scientific.<br
/> Taking a science-backed approach to user centered design on any application, let alone enterprise applications should lead to a better outcome for business and the users &#8211; internal and external.  Design work and user consultation takes place across the entire development lifecycle, surprises are reduced in user land, decisions about interfaces can be made early and changed early (and cheaply) if need be.<br
/> Enterprise apps don&#8217;t need to be &#8220;2.0&#8243;, but given a significant proportion of users are now used to using applications that interact with them in that style (if there is a 2.0 style), we should be making the effort to adopt the best of what they are experiencing and put it into enterprise applications.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vinnie mirchandani</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3330</link> <dc:creator>vinnie mirchandani</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:49:45 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3330</guid> <description>agree - but what is your definition of &quot;user&quot;? see my post this morninghttp://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/12/ui-again-dont-p.htmlif we can rethink UI and business process from the outside in - customer, supplier etc, I am all for it and ok with Ajaxing, web 2.0 it. But in turn I want UI for internal non-value added users turne off, destroyed...unfortunately internal users have more clout than external users like you...they can put more internal pressure on the CIO. Software salespeople walk their halls etc. so their cries for prettier UI get heard when frankly they should not be in the business process at all, at least not for data entry</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree &#8211; but what is your definition of &#8220;user&#8221;? see my post this morning</p><p><a
href="http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/12/ui-again-dont-p.html" rel="nofollow">http://dealarchitect.typepad.com/deal_architect/2007/12/ui-again-dont-p.html</a></p><p>if we can rethink UI and business process from the outside in &#8211; customer, supplier etc, I am all for it and ok with Ajaxing, web 2.0 it. But in turn I want UI for internal non-value added users turne off, destroyed&#8230;</p><p>unfortunately internal users have more clout than external users like you&#8230;they can put more internal pressure on the CIO. Software salespeople walk their halls etc. so their cries for prettier UI get heard when frankly they should not be in the business process at all, at least not for data entry</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doug Cornelius</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3329</link> <dc:creator>Doug Cornelius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:29:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3329</guid> <description>I will pass on sexy for &quot;personable.&quot;  I want my software to help engage me in my work and let me know that I am the center of her universe.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will pass on sexy for &#8220;personable.&#8221;  I want my software to help engage me in my work and let me know that I am the center of her universe.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vrempire</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3328</link> <dc:creator>vrempire</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:50:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3328</guid> <description>Yeah..developers and designers have two different mindset. doing both task at the same time looks a little bit like a conflict of interest. if small system, maybe fine. but if in an enterprise or Fortune 500 company, trouble will come. if not now, it will be later...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah..developers and designers have two different mindset. doing both task at the same time looks a little bit like a conflict of interest. if small system, maybe fine. but if in an enterprise or Fortune 500 company, trouble will come. if not now, it will be later&#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: NathanaelB</title><link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/comment-page-1/#comment-3324</link> <dc:creator>NathanaelB</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 10:49:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/12/10/enterprise-apps-can-and-should-be-sexy/#comment-3324</guid> <description>Absolutely the developers shouldn&#039;t be doing design; sorry, when I said &quot;software developers&quot; I meant vendors - as in companies, not individual programmers :)</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Absolutely the developers shouldn&#8217;t be doing design; sorry, when I said &#8220;software developers&#8221; I meant vendors &#8211; as in companies, not individual programmers <img
src='http://www.acidlabs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- This site's performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Dramatically improve the speed and reliability of your blog!

Learn more about our WordPress Plugins: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 5/21 queries in 2.454 seconds using disk

Served from: acmkokecse.gs01.gridserver.com @ 2010-03-14 09:56:12 -->