<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Burstworking discussion storm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/</link>
	<description>strategies, tools and processes to empower knowledge workers</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 07:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Collins</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1941</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Collins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 20:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1941</guid>
		<description>@James - my intent is not at all to be patronising of Anne.  Indeed, she and I have been emailing privately about my initial post and she doesn't seem bothered.
My use of "intellectual" and "whole new level" are used in a pure sense. Matthew's response, which I didn't entirely agree with (I love what Anne has written), has moved the conversation &lt;em&gt;literally into the academic space&lt;/em&gt; by opening with Drucker's definition of a knowledge economy and in that framework, discussing the need for appropriate management response to knowledge worker needs.  This, BTW is right up his alley; he's an organisational psychologist who works for a major Australian management consultancy giving (at times) just this sort of high-level advice.
Anne's post, on the other hand, is &lt;em&gt;a real-world, practical look&lt;/em&gt; at the nature of burst work and how it differs from burst work in actual manifestation.  No theoretical, academic discussion here, just real, practical advice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James - my intent is not at all to be patronising of Anne.  Indeed, she and I have been emailing privately about my initial post and she doesn&#8217;t seem bothered.<br />
My use of &#8220;intellectual&#8221; and &#8220;whole new level&#8221; are used in a pure sense. Matthew&#8217;s response, which I didn&#8217;t entirely agree with (I love what Anne has written), has moved the conversation <em>literally into the academic space</em> by opening with Drucker&#8217;s definition of a knowledge economy and in that framework, discussing the need for appropriate management response to knowledge worker needs.  This, BTW is right up his alley; he&#8217;s an organisational psychologist who works for a major Australian management consultancy giving (at times) just this sort of high-level advice.<br />
Anne&#8217;s post, on the other hand, is <em>a real-world, practical look</em> at the nature of burst work and how it differs from burst work in actual manifestation.  No theoretical, academic discussion here, just real, practical&nbsp;advice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James  Governor</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1944</link>
		<dc:creator>James  Governor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:38:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1944</guid>
		<description>the phrase "significantly more intellectual" could easily be taken as being patronising. taking the conversation to "a whole new level". wtf? Anne has started a great conversation, with lots of threads and her framework works rather well so far imho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the phrase &#8220;significantly more intellectual&#8221; could easily be taken as being patronising. taking the conversation to &#8220;a whole new level&#8221;. wtf? Anne has started a great conversation, with lots of threads and her framework works rather well so far&nbsp;imho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Euan Semple on social computing at acidlabs</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1943</link>
		<dc:creator>Euan Semple on social computing at acidlabs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 12:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1943</guid>
		<description>[...] to my recent posts on burst working as well as my past Enterprise 2.0 posts, UK-based social computing and Enterprise [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] to my recent posts on burst working as well as my past Enterprise 2.0 posts, UK-based social computing and Enterprise&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does Web 2.0 owe Peter Drucker? at Facibus Reviews</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1940</link>
		<dc:creator>What does Web 2.0 owe Peter Drucker? at Facibus Reviews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 01:38:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1940</guid>
		<description>[...] Steve Collins is not sure who Peter Drucker was. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Steve Collins is not sure who Peter Drucker was.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KM 2.0? &#171; Matt&#8217;s Musings</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1939</link>
		<dc:creator>KM 2.0? &#171; Matt&#8217;s Musings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1939</guid>
		<description>[...] some research to support my argument in a comment I made on a recent blog post by Stephen, &#8220;Burstworking storm discussion&#8220;, when I stumbled across an article by Allen Bonde on The (New) Age of Knowledge Management. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] some research to support my argument in a comment I made on a recent blog post by Stephen, &#8220;Burstworking storm discussion&#8220;, when I stumbled across an article by Allen Bonde on The (New) Age of Knowledge Management.&nbsp;[&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Magia3e</title>
		<link>http://www.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Magia3e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 23:51:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.acidlabs.org/2007/04/22/burstworking-discussion-storm/#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>What can I say, Drucker is cool :)

I'd like to see a greater awareness by managers, particularly in government, that the old-economy way of dealing with staff, hierarchies, fixed working hours, and a specific rate of flow of paper, just won't get anyone ahead in this emerging 21st century information age.

We all need to be more flexible in the way we work and that means more flexible everything, including technology support. We need ways of working flexibly and sharing knowledge flexibly.

Do the so called web-workers though need more support than others? Are web-workers more enlightened than others? Are they all burst rather than busy? Probably not. I would even go so far as to say that the notion of a web-worker is more a product of the in-group vs. the out-group, in the same way that "I'm more cool than you" or "I'm more creative than you" or even the "I'm Mac and you're Windows".

Rather than fight the busy v. burst war let's just all work toward helping old-school managers realise that their way just won't work in this New Age (just as Stephen rightly points out here).

.. and of course I'm sometimes wrong!

M</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What can I say, Drucker is cool <img src='http://www.acidlabs.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I&#8217;d like to see a greater awareness by managers, particularly in government, that the old-economy way of dealing with staff, hierarchies, fixed working hours, and a specific rate of flow of paper, just won&#8217;t get anyone ahead in this emerging 21st century information age.</p>
<p>We all need to be more flexible in the way we work and that means more flexible everything, including technology support. We need ways of working flexibly and sharing knowledge flexibly.</p>
<p>Do the so called web-workers though need more support than others? Are web-workers more enlightened than others? Are they all burst rather than busy? Probably not. I would even go so far as to say that the notion of a web-worker is more a product of the in-group vs. the out-group, in the same way that &#8220;I&#8217;m more cool than you&#8221; or &#8220;I&#8217;m more creative than you&#8221; or even the &#8220;I&#8217;m Mac and you&#8217;re Windows&#8221;.</p>
<p>Rather than fight the busy v. burst war let&#8217;s just all work toward helping old-school managers realise that their way just won&#8217;t work in this New Age (just as Stephen rightly points out here).</p>
<p>.. and of course I&#8217;m sometimes wrong!&nbsp;M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
