Josh Porter at Bokardo and Adam Darowski at Traces of Inspiration are putting forth the notion that the blog is the new résumé. I couldn’t agree more. Today, if you are blogging anything at all to do with your work, profession or your skills it’s all discoverable online. And easily so.
Your blog, your LinkedIn Profile, del.icio.us links, etc. all form a pretty complete picture of who you are, how you think and what you have to say. It’s critical that you behave responsibly and professionally online. That you vet your online, public material for stupid mistakes, whether those mistakes are spelling errors, factual issues, or that picture of you on Facebook at the fraternity kegger.
Any smart prospective employer is going to look you up online before they interview you. And if you’ve left ammunition or compromising material lying about on the Web, they should be seeking to call you out on it at interview.
So watch yourself and be smart. Make sure your blog postings, where professionally relevant, are smart, original and add value.
I agree but it also goes both ways. I Google anyone who I am going to interview with and often make decisions based on that.
Pingback: Traces of Inspiration » Blog Archive » Roundup of “The Blog is the New Resume” Discussion
Stephen — did just that today — somebody wanted my resume, so I sent them links to my blog and public Linkedin profile (hope I fixed up the speeling …)
I also find that I am much more motivated to keep my linkedin profile up-to-date than my regular resume.
One of the things I am struggling with are recent ‘connect with me on Linkedin’ requests. A number of recruitment agencies I have contacts with are now actively wanting to be one of my connections. Unfortunately I think this has less to do with me and more to do with my network. I’ve accepted some invitations with those agencies who I’ve found courteous and professional, but I have concerns about others who clearly want to use me for market intelligence and not a lot more.
Justin, I agree with your concerns. I am connected with a number of recruiters but those connections are largely because I have found work with the help of those recruiters or have met them some other way.
I make an effort not to be an easy conduit for connection-making. I have my own reputation and brand to protect.
Justin and Stephen, the last two comments touch a nerve with me, and make me want to review the LION type recruiter profiles that I have connected with. Most likely I’ll leave as is, but I do want to make sure the profiles titles, as part of my public brand, don’t get too keyword spammy (e.g. repeating LION or toplinked.com multiples times.)
Back to blog == resume– yes! And what a more transparent way for us to share work/business information one another. Exposing that info to the online fishbowl tamps down the tendency to reinvent one’s focus or niche with each resume transmission.
It all helps motivate me to get moving a bit faster on my own blog as well as be aware of what I’m putting out on the web …
Adam brings up a good argument:
“It seems a lot of tech folks just don’t care enough to blog. What is going to happen soon is that those people will not be able to land the really sweet gigs. Companies will be impressed by blogging candidates, knowing that they take their work seriously enough to document it and share it. Those who don’t blog will have to settle for the lackluster jobs. Maybe this isn’t a bad thing, since the sweet gigs often require a “way of life” attitude towards the work.”
I’m not sure if i’m 100% on board with this, but it does spur me on … i have not seen it be truth in my life, but it does make me lean towards looking for people online (blog, linked in, delicious, etc …) during the hiring process.
I agree this one.
This article reminds me of this article: http://mashable.com/2008/10/15/how-to-execute-against-your-resume/
This seems to be a common topic these days.
Stephen, I agree with “So watch yourself and be smart. Make sure your blog postings, where professionally relevant, are smart, original and add value.”, but I am sure you mean that we should be sure to post smart, where and when you do it.
I am not too sure about us not getting lackluster jobs if we do not blog. Some people never change jobs or rarely do so then after every 5 — 10 years. Should these people not blog, or should they?
I believe it a simple matter of choice but I definitely agree with Blog = Resume‘.
Related stories
Off to Boston
All the pieces fell into place today, and at short notice, I’m off to the Enterprise 2.0 Conference in Boston. I wanted desperately to go last year, so being able to go now is something of a wish come true. I expect to come back with my head full of enormous ideas, success stories and grand plans. I’m also hoping to finally meet in the flesh or catch up with a bunch of the great people I’ve been emailing, Tweeting and Facebooking over the past couple of years. If you’re coming to the conference, let me know here in the comments, so we can arrange to meet.
Delivering better presentations
I’m working on several presentations at the moment that I hope I will be able to deliver at some upcoming conferences. Like most people, in the past I have delivered presentations that largely consisted of dot points on a page, the occasional gag slide and Way. Too. Many. Words. That. I. Read. Straight. From. The. Slides. Asleep yet? No? Good. Let’s continue. The secret to being a great presenter is to tell a story. That story should be related to the slides, but not come from the slides. It’s all to do with Cognitive Load Theory, a concept developed by Professor John Sweller of the University of New South Wales, right here in Australia. What it boils down to is that if the information you’re seeing and the information you’re hearing are the same, you struggle to absorb it. However, if the visual and auditory inputs are related but not …
Why isn’t Government adopting social software?
My friend and former SMS colleague, Matthew Hodgson, has posted an insightful look into some of the reasons why government as a whole is resistant to the adoption of social networking tools. Matthew argues that bureaucracy — red tape, silos, command and control networks — is a significant factor, as is fear of what is not understood. Matthew quotes Toby Ward of CorporateWebsite.com on the issue of social tool use, particularly Facebook: “About half of the medium to large-sized organisations (it’s even higher in Government and Financial Services) forbid and block employees from using it.” Matthew also references this ZDNet Australia article that discusses the same issue. In that piece, Research vice president at analyst firm Gartner, Richard Harris, is quoted as saying: It’s mainly because of the risk aversion mentality in the public sector, they won’t start taking chances with unproven technologies just yet, though it is likely that some of the more innovative agencies …
What will the future of media look like?
If you attended Ross Dawson’s Future of Media Summit in Sydney or Silicon Valley yesterday, there are a few core take-aways you might have been left with: the artificial split/war between journalism and new media prevails everyone — PR, journalism, advertising and broadcasting — is trying to figure out this social networking and social media stuff (and I guess that’s good for people like me who can help with that) old media is changing and coming into the new world, although the old “pump it out and they will consume” attitude still persists closed formats and limited availability are still seen as viable business models what to do with and how to manage participant created content (rather than user generated content. Thanks, Chris Saad) is a puzzle many organisations are struggling with. There was a lot more, but these were certainly the most striking to me. I’ve summarised my thinking around each of these issues below. We …